New Israeli settlements in West Bank are illegal and inconsistent with international law: Blinken | World News


Charleston: New israeli settlements In Western coast Are illegal and inconsistent International lawUS Secretary of State Antony blinken has said, reversing the Trump-era policy. At a joint news conference with Argentinian Foreign Minister Diana Mondino in Buenos Aires, Blinken said he was disappointed by Israel's latest plans for settlement expansion.
Blinken said in response, “We have seen the reports, and I must say we are disappointed by the announcement. It has long been U.S. policy under Republican and Democratic administrations that new settlements are counterproductive to reaching a lasting peace.” One question.
A day later the top US diplomat said, “They are also inconsistent with international law. Our administration strongly opposes settlement expansion. And in our judgment, it only weakens – it does not strengthen – Israel's security. ” Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich indicated that more than 3,000 new dwellings would be added to the settlements.
The statement comes as the Biden administration's latest shift away from the pro-Israel policies pursued by former President Donald Trump.
The Trump administration reversed US policy of declaring that the settlements did not violate international law. In 2019, under Trump, then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo claimed that “the establishment of Israeli civilian settlements in the West Bank is not, in itself, inconsistent with international law”.
Blinken's statement was defended by the White House in Washington DC.
“(We) have seen those reports and, frankly, are disappointed by the announcement. It has been long-standing U.S. policy under both Republican and Democratic administrations that new settlements are counterproductive to peace. Frankly, , They are also inconsistent with international law. And this administration remains firm in our opposition to settlement expansion,'' White House spokesman John Kirby told reporters.
In November 2019, then-Secretary of State under then-President Donald Trump Mike Pompeo reversed four decades of US policy by saying the settlements did not violate international law, the New York Times reported.
“State Department lawyers never issued any new legal determinations that would prompt a change in policy, and Mr. Blinken's return to the old policy is a continuation of the department's long-running legal finding,” the daily reported. is in accordance with.”
“We are simply reaffirming the fundamental conclusion that these agreements are inconsistent with international law. This is a position that has been consistent across multiple Republican and Democratic administrations. If there is any administration that is being inconsistent, it is this last one.” Was.” Kirby told reporters.
In Buenos Aires, Blinken said he had seen reports about the post-war Gaza plan.
“I haven't seen the plan, so I want to reserve judgment until I see the details. Having said that, you know there are some basic principles that we set out several months ago and we think they will hold when it comes to The future of Gaza is of vital importance, including ensuring that it cannot be a platform for terrorism,” he said.
“Gaza should not be recaptured by Israel. The size of Gaza's territory should not be reduced. So, we want to make sure that whatever plan comes out is consistent with those principles. There are other principles as well, but those three are most important,” Blinken said.
“At the same time, there are a number of countries in our region that are working together on post-conflict Gaza planning. I think that's very important, and I've spent some time with some of our Arab partners, including recently. Including talking about the margins of the G20, as we did when we were together at the Munich Security Conference. So, it is important that we again have an essential plan, but also a plan that “that is consistent with the basic principles that I think many countries share about what the future of Gaza should be,” the Secretary of State said.
The reversal comes amid rising US-Israeli tensions over the war in Gaza, with tensions further heightened by the announcement of the latest agreement.
The International Court of Justice, the UN's highest court, is also hearing hearings on the legality of the Israeli occupation.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *