Sharif claims victory: what it means for India | World News

Feb 9, 2024

New Delhi: Imran Khan's party in jail PTI supported independent candidate It seemed that he had given a strong blow to the formidable pakistan army and its newly minted disciple Nawaz Sharif In the National Assembly elections, he maintained a steady lead over Sharif's PML(N) till late evening. Nevertheless, Sharif declared victory while acknowledging that he did not have a majority, raising hopes among his supporters of him becoming prime minister for a fourth time and raising concerns among others that the military might actually be defeating several independent candidates. Will encourage them to support them.

Imran Khan looted the gathering but Nawaz Sharif gave a victorious speech

For some, the return of Sharif or his brother Shehbaz as leaders of any coalition government united by the military promises a thaw in relations with India, given their past friendship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and their reported willingness to Does it. Improve relations with India. The rapport they shared when both were in office remained strong, evident again in 2020 when Modi wrote to 'Mian Saheb' to condole his mother's demise, and in Raiwind in 2015. Recalled the conversation with Sharif when he went to his house. That he did not allow the bitterness created by the Pathankot terror attack barely a week after his visit to tarnish his opinion of Sharif is a sign that the Indian Prime Minister believes Sharif's heart is in the right place. Unlike Imran Khan, whose intemperate statements against Modi created a stir, Modi and Sharif have remained civil to each other.
Proponents of this peace theory would argue that unlike 1999, when Prime Minister Vajpayee famously made his Lahore bus tour, and 2015 when Modi stayed at Sharif's residence, on this occasion Sharif would have received the support of the Pakistani military .

Many protests have started across Pakistan over allegations of election rigging, causing chaos in Pakistan.

However, in equal numbers, if not more, there is no incentive for India to plan peace outreach with a country grappling with economic and political disarray and a rapidly growing power differential between the two countries. In the current situation, perhaps it would make more sense for India to have calm and sensible talks with the military. It is assumed that the Indian government will return to its present form in May and at some stage it will realize that Pakistan's policy of zero involvement has worked.
Modi's three meetings with Sharif in 2015 – in Ufa, Paris and Raiwind – led to the resumption of composite talks under the new name of Comprehensive Bilateral Dialogue, but it was called off due to the attack on Pathankot airbase a few weeks later. Was stopped.

Former Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif won from Lahore seat

The Indian government would recall that it had joined that dialogue process only after being assured that the peace initiative had the full support of the then Army Chief Raheel Sharif. The Sharif-Army dispute had deepened earlier that year when Sharif failed to mention the Jammu and Kashmir issue in the Ufa joint statement, but the issue was resolved when a joint statement issued after the NSA meeting in Bangkok The “core issue” of Pakistan came to the fore again. Before the start of comprehensive bilateral talks in Islamabad during the visit of then External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj to Pakistan. These incidents led Modi to pay a dramatic visit to Sharif's ancestral home on his birthday.
Sharif will now have to account for a more evolved Indian stance on terrorism that is less tolerant of any distinction between state and non-state actors. Secondly, if he really thinks that his return can mark a new beginning, he will first have to stop Pakistan from behaving more Catholic than the Pope and demand from India its decision on Article 370 as a pre-condition. There should be no insistence on the demand for withdrawal. For better or worse, that issue has now been resolved, and India has shown that it will not tolerate any attempts by Pakistan to interfere in the running of the internal affairs of Jammu and Kashmir. Third, they have to accept that Pakistan did not do well by recalling its High Commissioner and stopping trade with India. If he can address both, India will certainly be inspired to respond positively. Fourth, and perhaps more importantly, he should start by saying something positive about the need to check cross-border terrorism, whose utility for Pakistan has clearly outlived its usefulness, and follow that with some concrete action .

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *